The statutes and some texts would lead you to believe that judgment interest is not compounded.  However, there are two cases which when read together, clearly allow interest on interest.

    The first is Phillips v. Ratley, 6 Kan. App. 2d 157, 627 P. 2d. 339 (1981) and the other is Iola State Bank v. Bolan, 235 Kan. 175, 679 P. 2d 720 (1984).

    These cases hold that the principal and pre-judgment interest (under 16-201) are to be added together to form a new principal amount which bears interest at the judgment rate.  This is not so if there is interest under a contract.  There, the judgment bears interest at the contract rate and the interest is applied only to the original principal amount.

    Chapter 60 judgments bear interest at a periodic rate in accordance with a schedule published annually by the Secretary of State, unless the judgment is based on a contract which specifies interest.  Click here to see the schedule.