SENATE BILL 20
This was introduced by the Special Committee
on Information Management, and
assigned to the Senate Public Health and
Welfare Committee. It would
establish a new statute providing for
limitations on disclosure and use of
health information.
SENATE BILL 21
This bill was introduced by the Special
Committee on Information
Management, and assigned to the Senate
Transportation and Tourism
Committee. It relates to the records
of the Division of Vehicles, and
places restrictions on the release of
some information.
SENATE BILL 87
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Judiciary Committee, and assigned
back to the same Committee. It amends
the civil procedure statutes to
delete the figure of $75,000.00 as the
highest amount that could be
specified in a claim for relief to be
the same as is specified in the
Federal rules of civil procedure.
This would permit Kansas to remain in
conformity with the Federal rules without
having to frequently amend our
statute to conform to changes in the Federal
statute. The bill passed the
Senate, and has been referred to the House
Judiciary Committee.
SENATE BILL 88
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Judiciary Committee, and referred
back to that Committee. It amends
the uniform commercial code to clarify
that the provisions of Article 9 of the
Uniform Commercial Code, secured
transactions, do not prevent the transfer
of ownership of accounts or
chattel paper. It further provides
that the determination of whether a
particular transfer of accounts or chattel
paper constitutes a sale or a
transfer of security interest is not governed
by Article 9 of the UCC. It
passed the Senate, and has been
referred to the House Judiciary Committee.
SENATE BILL 97
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Judiciary Committee and referred
back to that Committee. It amends
the statute relating to small claims
procedure to provide that a corporation
may be represented in court by an
officer of the corporation or by an agent
designated by corporate
resolution. The Committee held a hearing
on it on February 4, but thus far
has taken no action on it. It is
identical to SB 282 and HB 2360.
SENATE BILL 118
This bill was introduced by Sen. Clark
and was referred to the Senate
Judiciary Committee. It would provide
that notwithstanding any provisions
of law to the contrary, no person or entity
could be held liable for
damages resulting from an act of God.
(What about insurance policies?) It
was heard by a Subcommittee on February
3, but no action has been reported
on it yet.
SENATE BILL 143
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Judiciary Committee, and referred
back to that Committee. It amends
K.S.A. 60-2308 relating to exemptions
from claims of creditors, to make Roth
IRAs exempt. It has been scheduled
for hearing by a Subcommittee on Monday.
An identical bill has been
introduced in the House, HB 2342.
It passed the committee, and is on the
Senate calendar.
SENATE BILL 148
This was introduced by and referred back
to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
It provides that district magistrate
judges must have been a resident of
the county for at least 6 months prior
to being elected or appointed, and
must maintain residency in the county
while holding office. A hearing was
held Feb. 15. It is identical to
HB 2352 and HB 2329, which were also
heard Feb. 15.
SENATE BILL 250
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Assessment And Taxation Committee
and referred back to that Committee.
It relates to sales taxes, and
concerns taxation of contractor and subcontractor
services and materials.
As written, it does not concern
our groups. It is a bill to be watched as
it goes through the legislative process
to make sure that there is no
attempt to amend the bill to make professional
services subject to sales
tax.
SENATE BILL 259
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Committee on Financial Institutions
and Insurance, and referred to the Senate
Public Health And Welfare
Committee. It concerns insurance
companies, and deals with the privacy of
medical records, and enacts the Health
Information Privacy Act. Our
concern in prior sessions concerning this
type of legislation is that in
the interest of protecting privacy, such
legislation might make it
difficult to obtain information needed
for collection activities.
SENATE BILL 264
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Judiciary Committee, and referred to
that Committee. It concerns the
Consumer Protection Act, and prohibits the
assignment of support rights in consumer
transactions.
SENATE BILL 282
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Committee on Elections and Local
Government, and referred to the Senate
Judiciary Committee. It is
identical to SB 97, on which there was
a hearing Feb. 4, and also to HB
2360, providing authority
for corporations to be represented in small
claims courts by an officer or by anyone
designated by corporate
resolution.
SENATE BILL 286
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Committee on Federal and State
Affairs, and referred to the Senate Judiciary
Committee. It provides for
expedited eviction procedures.
SENATE BILL 299
This bill was introduced by the Senate
Judiciary Committee and referred
back to that committee. It provides
a procedure to move hearings and
trials, without changing venue,
from a courthouse that does not conform to
section 11 of the Americans with disabilities
act to a courthouse that does
conform. It has been re-referred
to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which
means that it is exempt from all deadlines.
SENATE BILL 306
This is the bill introduced by the Senate
Judiciary Committee at our
request concerning foreign judgments.
It was referred back to that
committee. I have prepared written
testimony in support of it for the
hearing on February 22.
SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1603
This was introduced by the Special Committee
on Information Management, and
assigned to the Senate Federal and State
Affairs Committee. It urges
Congress to pass the Freedom And Privacy
Restoration Act of 1998.
SENATE RESOLUTION 1803
This was introduced by the Special Committee
on Information Management, and
assigned to the Senate Transportation
and Tourism Committee. It would
require the Attorney General to bring
suit challenging provisions of the
federal law which requires that state
issued drivers' licenses and
non-driver identification cards must either
contain the holder's social
security number or that the state must
verify with the Social Security
Administration the social security number
of each applicant for a license
or identification card.
HOUSE BILL 2015
This was introduced by Representative O'Neal
and assigned to the House
Insurance Committee. It relates
to service of process upon insurance
companies and fraternal benefit societies,
to permit the service to be made
by certified mail, return receipt requested,
instead of by restricted mail.
The Committee made technical amendments
to the bill, and passed the bill as
amended. It passed the House, and
has been referred to the Senate
Judiciary Committee.
HOUSE BILL 2018
This was introduced by the Special Committee
on Information Management and
assigned to the House Governmental Organizations
and Elections Committee.
It would create a new statute which
would prohibit any state agency from
accepting for any identification-related
purpose any identification number
which another state agency already accepts
for an identification-related
purpose.
HOUSE BILL 2019
This was introduced by the Special Committee
on Information Management, and
assigned to the House Judiciary Committee.
It relates to criminal
statutes, amending the eavesdropping statute,
repealing the present breach
of privacy statute, and combines the two
into one crime known as invasion
of privacy.
HOUSE BILL 2083
This bill was introduced by the House Judiciary
Committee and referred back
to that Committee. It amends the
statute relating to collection of debts
owed to courts and restitution ordered
by courts, and the authority of the
Attorney General to contract for collection
services. It provides that the
cost of collection be paid by the defendant
as an additional court cost,
and that the cost of collection shall
be deemed an administrative fee make
necessary by the defendant's failure to
pay the court debt and restitution.
A hearing was held February 2, but
no action has been reported on it yet.
HOUSE BILL 2184
This was introduced by the Committee on
Judiciary, and referred back to the
Committee. It amends the code of
civil procedure for limited actions and
also amends forms 11, 20, 22 and 23.
One reason to keep an eye on this
bill is that it could be used as a vehicle
for other amendments that we
might want to have made. It passed
the House, and has been referred to the
Senate Judiciary Committee.
HOUSE BILL 2192
This bill was introduced by the House Committee
on Financial Institutions,
and referred back to that Committee.
It would provide any trustee who has
the duty or power to pay the debts of
a person who has died shall give
notice to creditors, in much the same
manner as notice to creditors is
required in probate proceedings.
It has passed the House, and has been
referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
HOUSE BILL 2197
This bill was introduced by 22 Representatives
and assigned to the House
Business, Commerce And Labor Committee.
It amends one of the consumer
protection statutes to provide that property
or services are considered to
be unsolicited unless the recipient specifically
requested, in an
affirmative manner, the receipt of the
property or services according to
the terms under which they are being
offered. It goes on to provide that
property or services are not considered
to have been affirmatively ordered
or requested if a person fails to respond
to a negative option invitation
or announcement to purchase the property
or services, and the property or
services are provided notwithstanding.
One of the 22 sponsors of the bill
is Rep. Al Lane, who chairs the committee
to which it was assigned. A
hearing was held on February 12.
HOUSE BILL 2206
This was introduced by and referred back
to the House Judiciary Committee.
It redesignates administrative judges
as chief judges, to eliminate
confusion between them and administrative
law judges. It passed the House
and has been sent to the Senate.
HOUSE BILL 2209
This is the bill which was introduced by
the House Judiciary Committee at
our request, to eliminate the prohibition
against wage garnishment on
assigned accounts. It was assigned
to the House Business, Commerce And
Labor Committee. It was passed by
the Committee, and initially placed on
the House consent calendar. However,
it was removed from the consent
calendar, and is now on the regular calendar
for debate.
HOUSE BILL 2221
This bill was introduced at our request
by the House Judiciary Committee
and referred back to that Committee.
It amends the statute in Chapter 61
which adopts by reference specified statutes
contained in Chapter 60. It
adds to the list of the Chapter 60 statutes
that apply to Chapter 61
proceedings K.S.A. 60-2610, relating to
civil liability for worthless
checks, and K.S.A. 60-2611, relating to
civil actions to collect on bad
checks and providing for reasonable attorney
fees to be assessed as costs.
I testified in support of the bill on
February 8. Following the hearing,
the Committee recommended the bill favorably
for passage and placed it on
the consent calendar. It passed
the House and has been referred to the
Senate Judiciary Committee.
HOUSE BILL 2222
This is another bill which was introduced
at our request by the House
Judiciary Committee, and assigned back
to that Committee. This is the bill
which provides that one action may be
brought to evict a tenant, and a
subsequent action can be brought for the
amount plaintiff claims to be due
from the defendant as rent. This
is to eliminate compliance problems with
the federal Fair Debt Collection Act.
I testified in support of the bill
at the hearing on February 8. The
Committee passed the bill, and it was on
the regular House calendar. It passed
the House, and has been referred to
the Senate Judiciary Committee.
HOUSE BILL 2323
This bill was introduced by the Committee
on Governmental Organization and
Elections, and referred back to that Committee.
It provides that no state
agency may refuse payment of fees paid
by personal check. It does give a
state agency authority to impose additional
fees and recover any cost
incurred by reason of payments made by
personal checks with insufficient
funds.
HOUSE BILL 2329
This was introduced by the House Judiciary
Committee, and referred back to
that Committee. It provides that
a District Magistrate Judge must be a
resident of the County for which elected
or appointed to serve at the time
of taking the oath of office and shall
maintain residency in the County
while holding office. A hearing was held
February 15.
It is identical to HB 2352 and to SB 148.
HOUSE BILL 2332
This is a bill introduced by the House
Judiciary Committee at our request,
and referred back to that Committee.
It is one of three bills containing
the changes we requested in order to have
our statutes relating to
garnishment and execution meet constitutional
muster. This relates to
writs of execution, provides for service
of notice, and establishes a new
form 29 to be added to the appendix of
forms following K.S.A. 60-269. The
other 2 bills are HB 2371 and HB2428,
which were heard February 15.
HOUSE BILL 2336
This was introduced by Rep. Swenson and
referred to the House Judiciary
Committee. It amends K.S.A. 20-3133
relating to clerks of the district
court to provide that the clerk or deputy
may assist the public in locating
legal forms, and provides that such assistance
shall not constitute the
practice of law.
HOUSE BILL 2342
This was introduced by Rep. Lightner and
13 other Representatives relating
to making Roth IRAs exempt from claims
of creditors. It is identical to SB
143. It will be heard Feb. 15.
HOUSE BILL 2343
This was introduced by the House Committee
on Utilities, and referred back
to that Committee. It amends the
statute concerning consumer protection
and relates to telecommunications services.
It would prohibit any
supplemental telecommunications services
being added to a consumer's
account without having the express authorization
of the consumer. A
hearing was held February 19.
HOUSE BILL 2345
This was introduced by Rep. Freeborn, by
request, and assigned to the House
Judiciary Committee. It would require
employers to inform any newly hired
employee that an employer is only required
to pay an employee for 90 days
of back pay, of not more than $4,000.00
for such back wages, if the
employer files for bankruptcy. It
would further provide that any person
who files bankruptcy and utilizes the
exemptions pursuant to article 23 of
Chapter 60 shall be required to hire a
CPA to annually audit that person's
finances for seven years following the
filing of the bankruptcy. It also
amends K.S.A. 60-2304 to reduce the value
of a means of conveyance that is
exempt from $20,000.00 to $6,000.00.
HOUSE BILL 2352
This was introduced by Rep. Schwartz and
referred to the House Judiciary
Committee. It is identical to HB
2329 and to SB 148, relating to residency
requirements for district magistrate judges.
The Committee passed it, and
so did the House. It has been sent
to the Senate.
HOUSE BILL 2359
This bill was introduced by Rep. Minor
and referred to the House Judiciary
Committee. It amends the statutes
concerning small claims procedure to
raise the maximum amount that can be sought
in a small claims procedure
from $1,800.00 to $2,500.00; and
increases the number of small claims that
may be filed by any person in any calendar
year from 10 to 20. A hearing
was held February 15.
HOUSE BILL 2360
This bill was introduced by Rep. Minor
and referred to the House Judiciary
Committee. It is identical to SB
97, which provides that a corporation may
be represented in small claims court by
an officer of the corporation or by
an agent designated by corporate resolution.
HOUSE BILL 2364
This was introduced by Rep. Adkins and
referred to the House Judiciary
Committee. It provides that neither
the home telephone number nor the home
address of a candidate for election or
retention as judge shall be
disclosed by any election officer.
HOUSE BILL 2371
This is one of the 3 garnishment-related
bills introduced at our request by
the House Judiciary Committee, and referred
back to that committee. It was
heard Feb. 15.
HOUSE BILL 2372
This was introduced by and referred back
to the House Judiciary Committee.
It would raise the mandatory retirement
age for judges from 70 to 75. It
was heard Feb. 16.
HOUSE BILL 2428
This is one of our three garnishment-related
bills introduced at our
request by the House Judiciary Committee
and referred back to it. A
hearing was held Feb. 15.
HOUSE BILL 2448
This was introduced by and referred back
to the House Judiciary Committee.
It provides that upon the approval
and filing of a supersedeas bond, any
judgment lien shall be discharged and
released.
HOUSE BILL 2450
This was introduced by and referred back
to the House Judiciary Committee.
It would eliminate the review of
the budget of the judicial branch by the
state budget director. The chief
justice would continue to submit the
judicial budget to the budget director,
but the chief's request would be
sent to the legislature in the annual
budget document without change by the
director. A hearing was held
February 16.
HOUSE BILL 2499
This bill was introduced by the House Judiciary
Committee and referred back
to that committee. It relates to
the to the election of District Court
Judges and District Magistrate Judges.
It would provide that all District
Judges and District Magistrate Judges
would be elected rather than
appointed, and further provides that all
such judges would be elected on a
non-partisan basis.
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 5006
This was introduced by the Special Committee
on Information Management, and
assigned to the House Judiciary Committee.
It urges Congress to pass the
Medical Privacy Act of 1998.
HOUSE RESOLUTION 6004
This was introduced by the Special Committee
on Information Management, and
assigned to the House Federal and State
Affairs Committee. It is identical
to Senate Resolution 1803.
Sincerely, Elwaine